Some did for a while but it has some nasty bugs and nobody is working on fixing it.
On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 03:08:54PM +0800, Michael W. Bombardieri wrote: > I remember reading a while ago that people were thinking to > use opencvs for anoncvs mirrors. I don't see any mirrors > reporting as opencvs though... > > $ for h in $hosts; do printf "%-30s" $h; export CVSROOT="anoncvs@$h:/cvs"; > cvs version | grep -v Client; done ; > anoncvs.au.openbsd.org Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) > 1.11.1p1 (client/server) > ftp5.eu.openbsd.org Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) > 1.11.1p1 (client/server) > anoncvs1.ca.openbsd.org Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) > 1.11.1p1 (client/server) > anoncvs.comstyle.com Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) > 1.11.1p1 (client/server) > openbsd.cs.toronto.edu Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) > 1.11.1p1 (client/server) > anoncvs.fr.openbsd.org Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) > 1.11.1p1 (client/server) > openbsd.cs.fau.de Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) > 1.11.1p1 (client/server) > mirror.osn.de Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) > 1.11.1p1 (client/server) > ftp.hostserver.de Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) > 1.11.1p1 (client/server) > anoncvs.jp.openbsd.org Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) > 1.11.1p1 (client/server) > openbsd.park.rambler.ru Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) > 1.11.1p1 (client/server) > anoncvs.obsd.si Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) > 1.11.1p1 (client/server) > anoncvs.eu.openbsd.org Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) > 1.11.1p1 (client/server) > anoncvs.spacehopper.org Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) > 1.11.1p1 (client/server) > anoncvs1.usa.openbsd.org Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) > 1.11.1p1 (client/server) > anoncvs3.usa.openbsd.org Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) > 1.11.1p1 (client/server) > mirror.planetunix.net Server: Concurrent Versions System (CVS) > 1.12.13 (client/server) > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:26:31AM +0000, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > > I think it is never going to rise from the dead. > > > > -------- Original message -------- > > From: Tobias Stoeckmann <tob...@stoeckmann.org> > > Date:30/10/2015 10:06 (GMT+00:00) > > To: "Michael W. Bombardieri" <m...@ii.net> > > Cc: Nicholas Marriott <nicholas.marri...@gmail.com>,tech@openbsd.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcs: buf_free/rcsnum_free > > > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 08:52:02AM +0800, Michael W. Bombardieri wrote: > > > Sorry. Here is new diff. Hopefully I haven't missed anything else. > > > > You missed OpenCVS, which shares the same code base. > > > > But is OpenCVS worth it anymore? > > Even a harsher question: Is it time to tedu it?
