On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:38:06PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > On Nov 17 17:21:42, j...@kerhand.co.uk wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 09:36:26AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > > > On Nov 14 14:17:08, k...@openbsd.org wrote: > > > > Modified files: > > > > sbin/fdisk : disk.c fdisk.c > > > > > > > > Log message: > > > > Since -l is ignored if -c/-h/-s are specified, make that combination > > > > invalid and mention the constraint in usage(). > > > > > > Mention it in the manpage too. > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > > i agree it makes sense to document it. but there is already similar text > > there for -u and -i, and this makes it a little consistent. > >
note i actually meant to say "inconsistent", not "consistent" > > i propose using the same text. are you happy with this? > > I agree that this is better. > fine, i'll fix in a sec. thanks for the mail. jmc > > > > > Index: fdisk.8 > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/fdisk/fdisk.8,v > > retrieving revision 1.87 > > diff -u -r1.87 fdisk.8 > > --- fdisk.8 26 Oct 2015 18:05:25 -0000 1.87 > > +++ fdisk.8 17 Nov 2015 17:19:53 -0000 > > @@ -79,6 +79,12 @@ > > or values that > > .Em /boot > > has passed to the kernel. > > +.Pp > > +Only one of > > +.Fl chs > > +or > > +.Fl l > > +can be specified. > > .It Fl e > > Use the > > .Nm > > @@ -127,6 +133,12 @@ > > .It Fl l Ar blocks > > Specify the number of blocks in the disk, and force the MBR to be in LBA > > mode only. > > +.Pp > > +Only one of > > +.Fl chs > > +or > > +.Fl l > > +can be specified. > > .It Fl u > > Update MBR bootcode, preserving existing MBR partition table. > > The MBR bootcode extends from offset 0x000 to the start of the MBR > > partition >
