On 2015-11-17, Jan Stary <h...@stare.cz> wrote: > I am not a native speaker, but the conversion specifiers > are "interpreted" by printf, not "interpolated", right?
I think "interpolated" as a technical term is correct here. (The Perl documentation is very fond of it.) > using a function like > .Fn snprintf , > as the resulting string may still contain user-supplied conversion specifiers > -for later interpolation by > +for later interpretation by > .Fn printf . > .Pp > Be sure to use the proper secure idiom: -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
