Hi Ted, Ted Unangst wrote on Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:51:34AM -0500:
> Neither strftime nor strptime describe the fields inside struct tm, > and while they eventually point that way in references, strftime > provides no guidance as to which of its nine (9!) references > I should read next. I don't like guessing. Feel free to drop the pair of parentheses in the strptime.3 case if you want to, they don't seem to be needed, like so: +.Fa tm +described in +.Xr mktime 3 . Either way, OK schwarze@. Ingo > Index: strftime.3 > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/time/strftime.3,v > retrieving revision 1.34 > diff -u -p -r1.34 strftime.3 > --- strftime.3 29 Jan 2015 01:46:31 -0000 1.34 > +++ strftime.3 30 Dec 2015 16:46:29 -0000 > @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ The > .Fn strftime > function formats the information from > .Fa timeptr > +(as described in > +.Xr mktime 3 ) > into the buffer > .Fa buf > according to the string pointed to by > Index: strptime.3 > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/time/strptime.3,v > retrieving revision 1.24 > diff -u -p -r1.24 strptime.3 > --- strptime.3 4 Dec 2014 00:10:40 -0000 1.24 > +++ strptime.3 30 Dec 2015 16:47:17 -0000 > @@ -44,7 +44,9 @@ function parses the string > according to the specified > .Fa format > and fills matching data into the structure > -.Fa tm . > +.Fa tm > +(described in > +.Xr mktime 3 ) . > .Pp > The > .Fa format >
