Jonathan Gray wrote: > I don't think we should enable -pedantic anywhere in the tree. > Different versions of gcc are going to have different ideas of what > pedantic is.
This was my reaction too. I like the approach of keeping few to no warnings in default builds. It's easy to "env CFLAGS='-Wextra -pedantic' make" when you're auditing. > I'm not sold on the value of all these patches to nvi when it is > possibly hindering people who may be looking to add utf-8 support (via > nvi2 or otherwise). I think that vi is enough of a mess to warrant this. Most of these patches are getting accepted upstream, too. I'm no longer actively upstreaming, but I think Martijn and Michael Reed are.
