Hi Philip, Philip Guenther wrote on Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 08:16:21PM -0700: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Ingo Schwarze <[email protected]> wrote:
>> By the way, since sendsyslog(2) is only intended to be called by >> syslog(3) and not directly by application code, i'd prefer to have >> syslog(3) listed instead of sendsyslog(2) - but that's probably a >> seperate matter. > I'm inclined to list both; we document our internal system calls and > users can see them in the source and in kdump output. Listing both is even better. It helps both casual users and people who care about the gory details. Yours, Ingo
