On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 04:43:56PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> > On 28 Apr 2016, at 22:49, Mark Kettenis <mark.kette...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >
> >> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:50:53 +0200
> >> From: Martin Pieuchot <m...@openbsd.org>
> >>
> >> The reason why we do not use 'static' in the kernel is no longer valid
> >> since all our platforms are ELF. ddb(4) handle them just fine.
> >>
> >> Here's an example after setting 'static' in the uhci(4) driver:
> >>
> >> $ nm /bsd |grep uhci_poll_hub
> >> ffffffff81107080 t uhci_poll_hub
> >>
> >> $ nm /obsd |grep uhci_poll_hub
> >> ffffffff81107080 T uhci_poll_hub
> >>
> >> Diff below convert and unify all the Makefile.$arch to no longer remove
> >> local symbols.
> >>
> >> ok?
> >
> > In principle this diff is fine. I don't expect the symbol tables to
> > grow too much by this.
> >
> > However, using static in the kernel is still bad. The compiler will
> > optimize away static functions, and when that happens they won't show
> > up in the backtraces.
>
> can we throw in -fno-inline to prevent that? or do we not trust gcc?
that would completely disable inlining, even for inline functions.
-Otto
