> Martin Natano wrote: > > It is time for the lockmgr() api to die. The api is only used by > > filesystems, where it is a trivial change to use rrw locks instead. All > > it needs is LK_* defines for the RW_* flags. (See the sys/lock.h hunk in > > the diff below.) > > > > The ffs regress tests display the same number of fail/ok results before > > and after applying diff below, and I have done some manual testing with > > various filesystems on amd64 and macppc. > > > > Again, the purpose is to make filesystem code less scary and more > > comprehensible. > > Yes, I'm concerned this needs lots of testing, but it is the right thing to > do.
I won't be testing this in snapshots, because there is too much churn in ports at the moment.
