On 2016/06/10 16:05, Mark Kettenis wrote: > In any case this is something we can figure out once the code hits the > tree. Unless mpi@ is still unhappy with the way the driver performs > ioctls, I think we should get the driver bits into the tree such that > we can work on fixing the remaining issues with it.
Agreed. Did people notice the uhub.c part? Any concerns with that? > The ifconfig bits seem to be a bit more controversial. And we > defenitely need to test those in a RAMDISK context as well. yes.
