On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Miod Vallat <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Noted by VS2013, const values should be initialized (though I think > >> the 'static' should also implicitly zero). > > > > this sounds like the compiler doesn't know C? > > He is talking about Visual Studio. The C part of that piece of shit > pretending to be a compiler only supports a subset of C89. > > Well, it's more of a C++ compiler pretending to be a C compiler :)
This is the only const in the LibreSSL tree that's not explicitly initialized though, right or wrong. There are plenty more things it complains about, if we wanted to mull over the full list. Possibly a few bits of gold amongst the slag.
