> > > Index: net/if.h
> > > ===================================================================
> > > RCS file: /cvs/openbsd/src/sys/net/if.h,v
> > > retrieving revision 1.177
> > > diff -u -p -u -p -r1.177 if.h
> > > --- net/if.h      10 Jun 2016 20:33:29 -0000      1.177
> > > +++ net/if.h      19 Jul 2016 13:41:53 -0000
> > > @@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ struct if_msghdr {
> > >   int     ifm_addrs;      /* like rtm_addrs */
> > >   int     ifm_flags;      /* value of if_flags */
> > >   int     ifm_xflags;
> > > + pid_t   ifam_pid;       /* identify sender */
> > >   struct  if_data ifm_data;/* statistics and other data about if */
> > >  };
> > 
> > should this be ifm not ifam?
> > 
> > it might be better after ifm_data (probably won't pack as well, but
> > I think lower impact on software using if_msghdr).
> > 
> 
> No the goal is to keep the pid at the same offset of all routing messages
> no matter what type. The drawback is that this is a ABI change and we need
> to double check that it is possible to hump over this without breaking
> network.

This is somewhat of a concern.  We are now 10 days before people travel
to g2k16.

ABI break deadline should probably be tomorrow or the day after.

Reply via email to