Alexander Bluhm wrote: > Several possible solutions like letting tasks sleep at a different > priority or changing kernel threads to user priority have been > discussed. There was no consensus what to do. > > To move forward and uncouple the splicing improvement from the > scheduler discussion, I would like to commit my original diff with > the yield() workaround.
fine by me. i was hoping we might resolve the need for the yield if it were a simple problem, but since not, this won't cause trouble later.
