On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 01:54:46PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
> <jas...@openbsd.org> wrote:
> > Do we really want the filename to be printed in the message? If so we should
> > use __FILE__. On the other hand, having the function name makes more sense
> > to
> > me.
>
> This is a "not found" message in response to an explicit user command:
> why does the user care what *source file* is generating that message?
I have no idea why the user would care about the source file. However the
function triggering it might be of some more information, albeit of dubious
added value. Perhaps the message should be normalized across the board
following arm/sparc64?
> arm and sparc64 do the Right Thing IMO:
> if (p == NULL) {
> (*pr)("not found\n");
> return;
> }
>
> Philip Guenther
--
jasper
