wont this also mean if it is not running i have to wait for the localhost attempt to fail before the resolver moves on? (ASR_STATE_NEXT_NS, etc) so i slow everything down for a timeout?
dont get me wrong, it is an interesting direction, but I think maybe get the rest of the five line changes into rebound to make it useful and then look at libc which might need slightly more cleverness than just adding localhost unconditionally. On Wednesday, 14 September 2016, Ted Unangst <t...@tedunangst.com> wrote: > Bob Beck wrote: > > how is rebound going to handle a change in resolv.conf? thats still a > > problem here > > oh, that's easy. it watches the file for changes. i never quite got around > to > that, but it's another five lines. >
