On 2016-09-26, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <j...@wxcvbn.org> wrote: >>> So I think that we agree that EISDIR is more useful, and seems safe from >>> a portability POV. I've built base and x sets on i386, and ajacoutot >>> ran the ports bulk builds. The two offenders in the ports tree were due >>> to an unrelated glitch in base libtool which has since been fixed. > > I haven't received a single test report, which is far from sufficient > for such a change. Even though I'm convinced that such a change would > be a benefit, I won't push this further.
I think your proposal came at a bad time when there was too much other action in the tree. I've run an amd64 package build with it (because I didn't read the above that said that aja had already done so), which worked just fine. I don't think we're going to see more of a real-world test unless the diff goes into snapshots. FWIW, I'm in favor of this change. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
