On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:49:06AM +0000, Jason McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:05:02PM -0800, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote: > > In responding to a post on misc@, I noticed that bioctl(8) uses all sd(4) > > devices in the examples sections while softraid(4) uses wd(4) devices > > for the chunks. This patch updates softraid.4 to use sd(4) devices as > > well. I have not used a wd(4) device in years and I think it more > > confusing to use examples with wd(4) when almost everything these days > > is sd(4). > > i kind of disagree: i don;t think it does any harm to show these examples > using wd. if anything, it might force the reader to think about what > they're doing. > > note also that the final example in bioctl(8) has an example using a > chunk on a wd disk.
I did notice that too. I can understand that point of view. If that is preferred, it is fine by me. Bryan
