On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Mark Kettenis <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 11:04:43 +0100 > > From: Patrick Wildt <[email protected]> > > > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 02:16:25PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > > > Patrick Wildt wrote: > > > > > > > > Maybe they want to support older binutils that do not support the > unified syntax? > > > > What's our policy there? > > > > > > OpenBSD is just about the oldest binutils around. I wouldn't worry > about > > > anything older than what we have in base. > > > > Considering that, I'm going to ask for OKs then. > > > > ok? > > ok kettenis@, but lets give the LibreSSL people a chance to raise any > portability concerns as they might have a better idea about LibreSSL > portable deployment on ARM. > > ok bcook@ - we don't even enable assembly on ARM in portable. Happy if someone wants to help change that.
