Re: pfsync(4) vs splnet()

[Alexandr Nedvedicky]

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 04:10:25PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> pfsyncioctl already runs under the NET_LOCK() and pfsync(4) doesn't
> touch any hardware so these splnet() are useless.
> 
> ok?

looks good to me.

OK sashan@