On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 07:05:08PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 07:51:44AM +0000, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 06:15:59PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > From lld svn rev 324739 with -z muldefs and -z retpolineplt text removed > > > to match lld 5.0.1. > > > > > > > morning. > > > > this will replace the ld page for archs building llvm, right? haven;t > > the stomach to read it yet, but no objections. you should probably add > > an Nm entry to NAME for "ld" though: > > > > .Sh NAME > > .Nm ld.lld , > > .Nm ld > > lld is ld only on arm64 but is built/installed on all archs that build > llvm as ld.lld. So we can't do that at the moment as ld is binutils/bfd > ld everywhere else. >
ah ok. it will still make sense no? if it gets installed for arm64 only it will be correct for that arch and the situation unchanged for others. or have i misunderstood? > > > > also don;t know if you tag this stuff $OpenBSD$ or not. > > Adding $OpenBSD$/$Mdocdate$ would be local diffs. I'm inclined > to not add them. > fair enough. jmc
