Hi Gregoire, Gregoire Jadi wrote on Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:44:41AM +0200: > Ingo Schwarze <schwa...@usta.de> writes:
>> Feedback is welcome both on the general idea and on the specific >> implementation. The result of that feeback was "we don't want it, the whole idea of changing this is pointless and dangerous", so i deleted my patch quite some time ago. The conversation resulted in a clarification in the manual page, though. > Thank you for working on this. I have tested your patch > and both `rm -P` and `rm -Pf` work as expected. Sorry, it won't be committed, it was definitely rejected. Besides, it wasn't correct, there were race conditions. Working on improving it would be a waste of time. Yours, Ingo
