On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 06:01:05PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 05:52:43PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 05:41:56PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > > I would prefer to access pfa.v6 than to rely on the fact that pf_addr
> > > contains a union as the first field. And the memcpy() is eqivalent
> > > to the following assignment as both structures are aligned.
> > >
> > > pfa.v6 = ((struct sockaddr_in6 *)sa)->sin6_addr;
> > Agreed, except `pfa' is a pointer so rather `pfa->v6'.
> >
> > Works expected, OK with that?
>
> OK bluhm@
>
either way (memcpy() vs. bluhm's suggestion) is OK with me.
sashan@
