On 2018/09/12 17:38, Jason McIntyre wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 02:05:25PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > > > > > + warnx("anchors apply to -f, -F, -t and -s only"); > > > > If I understand English comma rules correctly, there is also a comma > > before the " and". At least this is what we do in the man page. > > > > bluhm > > > > hi. > > just to note: it is not wrong to omit the comma. i personally use them > there, because it eliminates some potential confusion in lists. but it > does sometime look/read better without. it's a matter of taste i guess. > > jmc >
btw (as jmc will already know of course!) this is known as an "Oxford comma" or "serial comma", you will find a *lot* of references and arguments in both directions if you search ;)