On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 05:40:49PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote: > hi. > > i'm all for the diff but... generally usage() does not spit out a > description of the options (with some exceptions). if you look at the > man page, the irony is that the usage seems more verbose. > > anyone object to removing the list that follows the synopsis? if not, > i'd prefer that. > > unrelated question: anyone know why the argument to -g is "gap3len"? > > jmc
Hello, I agree, removing it from usage() and putting the information in the man page is more inline with other OpenBSD utilities. I might get to that on Friday or during the weekend. (not 100% sure on the gap3len, but I believe it's kinda like a safety gap used to compensate between the slight differences between the drive that originally wrote the disk and the one that is currently writing the disk) Thanks for the feedback. -- Sascha Paunovic <aza...@posteo.net>
