On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 01:49:00PM +0800, Michael Mikonos wrote: > Re-reading the unveil manual I found a typo which isn't flagged > by a spell checker. Does anyone prefer just doing s/paths// though? >
morning. ok for your diff - no opinion on the s/paths// suggestion. jmc > > Index: unveil.2 > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/sys/unveil.2,v > retrieving revision 1.10 > diff -u -p -u -r1.10 unveil.2 > --- unveil.2 26 Sep 2018 02:54:34 -0000 1.10 > +++ unveil.2 26 Sep 2018 05:44:09 -0000 > @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ This means that a directory that is remo > .Fn unveil > will appear to not exist. > .Pp > -Non-directories paths are remembered by name within their containing > +Non-directory paths are remembered by name within their containing > directory, and so may be created, removed, or re-created after a call to > .Fn unveil > and still appear to exist. >
