Stuart Henderson([email protected]) on 2018.11.11 21:55:19 +0000: > On 2018/11/11 22:45, Job Snijders wrote: > > Shouldnt we already bomb out at the following? > > > > cannot bind to 0.0.0.0:179: Address already in use > > cannot bind to [::]:179: Address already in use > > > > In any regard, I agree with the functionality proposed. No strong opinion > > on the diff itself. > > Should: probably, yes, but we don't at present. > > Last time I did this by mistake I ended up having to get onto the *peer* > via OOB, I can't remember if killing bgpd was enough, I have a feeling I > had to force a reboot..
I was the other one who happened to fat finger this recently (and suggest to remi to do this). I think i also rebootet the router as fast as i could, because i wanted to rid myself of more dropped packets.
