Seen on one of my systems:
92667 as-set elements in 64963 tables using -22.5M of memory
339029 prefix-set elements using 14.0M of memory
RIB using 401M of memory
Sets using -8.5M of memory
Now there is no such thing as negative memory so there is an accounting
error. Looking at the code I noticed that I missed to account the inital
allocation.
OK?
--
:wq Claudio
Index: rde_sets.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/bgpd/rde_sets.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.6 rde_sets.c
--- rde_sets.c 26 Oct 2018 16:53:55 -0000 1.6
+++ rde_sets.c 5 Jan 2019 11:17:55 -0000
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ set_new(size_t nmemb, size_t size)
rdemem.aset_cnt++;
rdemem.aset_size += sizeof(*set);
+ rdemem.aset_size += set->size * set->max;
return set;
}
