On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 01:28:15PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > We should not implement the magic which device allows fsync(2) into > dd(1). Just do what the user says, if it is nonsense, give him an > error. Seems reasonable to me.
> > I know this wording is similar to fsync(2), but I think I'd prefer just a > > reference. The output may not be permanent storage. I agree with tedu. OK kn
