You didn't ask for an enduser opinion but you should go ahead but I suggest a hard change.
I can tell you people will continue to use the old method until it no longer works. -----Original Message----- From: owner-t...@openbsd.org <owner-t...@openbsd.org> On Behalf Of Tobias Heider Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2019 1:53 PM To: tech@openbsd.org Cc: r...@openbsd.org; s...@spacehopper.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: iked curve25519 +1 for adding ID 31 Maybe add the proper one but also keep the old to give people some time to update their stuff if this is a problem. There should be more than enough reserved IDs. On 3/30/19 8:35 PM, Reyk Floeter wrote: > I like the idea of switching it to the proper ID. > > Reyk > >> Am 30.03.2019 um 20:31 schrieb Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org>: >> >> curve25519 had a proper ID (31) assigned in 2016 but we still have >> the draft private-use ID in iked. Any thoughts on whether we can just >> cut across to the proper ID, or whether that will be too painful? >> Are many people using this already? >> >
