Martijn van Duren wrote: > Is there a sound reason to keep this code here that I'm overlooking > or can we please remove it?
I'll add that the umask calls make this function unsafe in a threaded program, which I think is unexpected.
Martijn van Duren wrote: > Is there a sound reason to keep this code here that I'm overlooking > or can we please remove it?
I'll add that the umask calls make this function unsafe in a threaded program, which I think is unexpected.