> On arm64, pci_intr_handle_t is a pointer to an opaque struct.

That's a subtle trap.  How would someone realize the order is wrong...

Would it not be better if this was done like the other architectures,
where the pci_intr_handle_t is a structure, not a pointer.

On arm64, the pci subsystems seem to use structures which are
the same, and additional fields could be added easily if there
was a need later.

Reply via email to