On 2019/10/03 11:56, sven falempin wrote: > BTW, on modern system RAM is plentiful while SSD are not always '/tmp' > friendly.
Some of the slower media (CF/SD cards etc) might have issues eventually but I would expect anything worthy of the name 'SSD' should be fine. > Using tmpfs for /tmp, <breaks> vi unless you create a proto with vi.recover > subdir or create it on rc.local. > maybe a mkdir /tmp/vi.recover.uid would make sense, or just a mktemp . eh? - vi.recover is created by /usr/libexec/vi.recover which is run from /etc/rc already - tmpfs is disabled in the kernel config for a reason
