> On 5 Nov 2019, at 13:55, Martin Pieuchot <m...@openbsd.org> wrote:
>
> Take the safe approach of converting `boolean_t' to `int', `TRUE' to `1'
> and `FALSE' to `0'.
>
> This is to reduce the typedef mess that requires pulling MD/MI headers.
>
> Per-arch ddb code will follow, ok?
I’m ok with the diff (yay for cleaning that mess), a few trivial nits:
> Index: ddb/db_command.c
> @@ -199,15 +199,14 @@ db_command(struct db_command **last_cmdp
> int t;
> char modif[TOK_STRING_SIZE];
> db_expr_t addr, count;
> - boolean_t have_addr = FALSE;
> - int result;
> + int result, have_addr = 0;
You could merge this with the ‘int t’ a few lines above.
> Index: ddb/db_examine.c
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ db_examine(db_addr_t addr, char *fmt, in
> for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> value =
> db_get_value(addr+bytes, 1,
> - FALSE);
> + 0);
This and the next ones can now go on the same line as db_get_value(), no?
> db_printf("%02lx",
> (long)value);
> bytes++;
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ db_examine(db_addr_t addr, char *fmt, in
> /* Print chars, use . for non-printables */
> while (bytes--) {
> value = db_get_value(addr + incr, 1,
> - FALSE);
> + 0);
Idem.
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ db_examine(db_addr_t addr, char *fmt, in
> incr = 0;
> for (;;) {
> value = db_get_value(addr + incr, 1,
> - FALSE);
> + 0);
Idem.
Cheers,
Jasper
