On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:42:42AM +0100, Joerg Goltermann wrote: > I think I found the problem inside pf_ioctl.c, it looks like > the problem was introduced with a "mechanical" patch which > replaced all "breaks;" with "PF_UNLOCK(); break;" This seems > to be wrong in this particular case: I agree.
OK kn sashan, while here, would you mind fixing the following to use proper '\0' 1970 pr->path[sizeof(pr->path) - 1] = 0; ... 1976 pr->name[0] = 0;
