On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 08:58:16PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2019/12/30 01:13, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > Now that `ldomctl console ...' is implemented there is actually no need > > to print the device any longer, it is an implementation detail that > > should be hidden just like it is the case with vmctl. > > But vmctl does show the device ..? Sloppiness on my side, sorry.
kettenis presented his use case and you proved my argument for consistency to be invalid, so I have no plans for dropping the TTY column any longer. Thanks everyone :-)
