On 04/01/20(Sat) 16:30, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 16:15:22 +0100
> > From: Martin Pieuchot <[email protected]>
> >
> > `delay' is expressed in ms, however since tsleep_nsec(9) doesn't add a
> > tick the conversions below might result in shorter sleeps. I'd
> > appreciate if uthum(4) owners could test this diff and report back.
>
> I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here.
>
> But this made me look at the implementation of tsleep_nsec(), and I
> think its implementation is wrong.
I agree, that's what I'm saying in this thread:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=157804662128799&w=2
