5 января 2020 г. 22:37:05 GMT+02:00, Ted Unangst <t...@tedunangst.com> пишет: >Vadim Zhukov wrote: >> Today I get really upset and angry due limitation of top(1): it shows >> only hrrm, top processes (thank you, Chromium). Now here is a diff >that >> allows you to scroll process list by line or by half a screen. >> >> I've used the '0' and '9' keys to scroll down and up, respectively. >> Unfortunately, 'k' is already taken, so vi-like binding to 'j'/'k' >keys >> is not possible. And emacs-style 'v'-for-all looks like too complex. >> Anyone, who wants to use up/down and page up/page down keys, be my >guest >> for converting command_chars in top.c to using multi-byte sequences, >> or whatever is needed for proper handling of those keys. >> >> Ideas, comments and (may I hope?) okays are welcome. :) > >One of each? It would be nice to extend this with some indication of >where we >are in the display (a first line that says skipping 19). I would have >used >,.<> as navigation keys, but no matter. And it seems to work great, so >ok.
Yes, indication would be good and I thought about it, too. But implementing it in current top(1) code is not that straightforward, unfortunately, so I planned to do this separately, avoiding complication of the current diff. Thanks! -- With best regards, Vadim Zhukov
