Re: refer to pointers as non-null

[Klemens Nanni]

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 05:33:05AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Noticed this in wait.2, though I imagine other occurences abound.
> 
> I believe non-null is clearer when refering to a pointer than non-zero, which
> is a bit 80s, and less likely to be mistaken for the value pointed to. This
> same page also refers to non-zero values, fwiw.
Agreed, OK kn