On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 21:44:21 +0000, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > Looks like the existing code is OK, you still want to test the original > expression even if you are predicting it is false, no?
Right, the code is correct as written. - todd
On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 21:44:21 +0000, Nicholas Marriott wrote: > Looks like the existing code is OK, you still want to test the original > expression even if you are predicting it is false, no?
Right, the code is correct as written. - todd