Marcus Glocker <mar...@nazgul.ch> wrote: > Instead of introducing the CLI parameter controls in video(1), we could > introduce videoctl(1) in base, same as we have with audioctl(1). This > also gives us the possibility to only display the current video > parameters.
I must have missed something. Why does it need to be a seperate comment. Won't this produce confusion? Why can video do this? Is it really correct for the video hardware to have persistant settings? Would it not be better if the required mode was always commanded when a video is being recorded?
