Re: diff: pfctl: error message for nonexisting rtable

[Klemens Nanni]

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 12:42:27PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote:
> It's not clear for me why non-existing rdomain is accepted but
> non-existing rtable is rejected.  I suppose we can make pf(4) can
> handle a packet for the non-existing routing table as if the routing
> table is empty.
Probably possible, but not without further tests or even changes to pf;
I did not want to imply that dynamic `rtable' in pf.conf cannot be done.