> Q: would the introduction of SYSCTL_BOOL be considered an improvement > over "0, 1"?
Absolutely gross and unneccessary. 0-1 is not neccessarily boolean. It remains entirely possible that range of values is a count.
> Q: would the introduction of SYSCTL_BOOL be considered an improvement > over "0, 1"?
Absolutely gross and unneccessary. 0-1 is not neccessarily boolean. It remains entirely possible that range of values is a count.