Jan Klemkow <j.klem...@wemelug.de> wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 12:18:43PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > I would like a further justification for removing these ports from > > the very limited dynamic reserved space used by bindresvport. > > > > (but not by rresvport, which appears still stomp over them) > > > > For tcp, 32 of the 512 are locked out. > > For udp, 19. > > > > What software is actually using these ports? > > > > Is that software irrelevant these days? > > I'm working on a diff to bring ftps with libtls into our ftpd(8). There > is a "getaddrinfo(NULL, "ftps", &hints, &res0)" call, which uses this > port. Thus, I made this change.
Hang on -- does the world want ftps support?
