On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 01:15:05PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: > On 13.5.2021. 1:25, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: > > It seems this lock order issue is not parallel diff specific. > > > > Yes, you are right ... it seemed familiar but i couldn't reproduce it > on lapc trunk or without this diff so i thought that parallel diff is > one to blame .. > > > sorry for noise .. >
Timeout thread and interface destroy thread are both serialized by kernel lock so it's hard to catch this issue. So your report is useful :)
