You've made a pretty big assumption there. When we see something we don't think is important, we delete the email and carry on with more important things.
You think hand-tuning this one paragraph is going to reduce the amount of mail we delete because it doesn't matter? It won't. A large number of inaccurate documentation problems in the world can be solved by deleting the innacurate documentation rather than trying to fine-tune it to be more accurate for the moment, until it becomes inaccurate again. In truth, noone cares about this paragraph. It has been perceveived as a promise. We don't need to make statements people perceive as promises. Patrick Harper <paia...@fastmail.com> wrote: > Because you might not wish to deal with people like me posting dmesg's > of absurdly deficient hardware on the lists. Putting minimum values up > means you can cast off everything you don't want to bother trying to > support as 'not worth your time', without anyone else having to > discover that it wasn't worth their time either. > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, at 21:25, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > We don't list memory sizing for other architectures. Why list it for i386? > > > > Why not delete the text? > > > > Because someone wants the truth? You can't handle ....
