Klemens Nanni: > > > Now this is clearly a "slow" path. I don't think there is any reason > > > not to put all the code in that if (uvw_wxabort) block under the > > > kernel lock. For now I think making access to ps_wxcounter atomic is > > > just too fine grained. > > > > Right. Lock the whole block. > > Thanks everyone, here's the combined diff for that. -snip-
FWIW, I ran an amd64 package bulk build with this. No problems. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
