On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 07:43:35AM -0400, Bryan Steele wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 01:20:10PM +0200, Frederic Cambus wrote: > > Hi tech@, > > > > The base system includes the compiler-rt profile library for > > source-based code coverage. > > > > So here is a diff to document support in clang-local.1, the same > > way we document support for the ubsan_minimal sanitizer runtime > > which is also part of compiler-rt. > > > > Comments? OK? > > > > Index: share/man/man1/clang-local.1 > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man1/clang-local.1,v > > retrieving revision 1.23 > > diff -u -p -r1.23 clang-local.1 > > --- share/man/man1/clang-local.1 18 Feb 2022 00:39:18 -0000 1.23 > > +++ share/man/man1/clang-local.1 4 May 2022 11:03:11 -0000 > > @@ -99,6 +99,15 @@ See the documentation for the > > .Fl fsanitize-minimal-runtime > > flag. > > .It > > +The base system includes the compiler-rt profile library for > > +source-based code coverage. See the documentation for the > > +.Fl fprofile-instr-generate > > +and > > +.Fl fcoverage-mapping > > +flags. > > +Note that llvm-profdata and llvm-cov tools from devel/llvm are > > +required to process coverage data and produce reports. > > +.It > > The > > .Xr malloc 3 , > > .Xr calloc 3 , > > Isn't the purpose of the clang-local(1) to document local changes to the > system compiler, -fsanitize-minimal-runtime feels like a special case as > we do not have the complete sanitizer runtime.
What do you suggest as a good location where people will find that information easily ?
