On 2022/05/05 08:36, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > Agreed, there is also IN_BADCLASS() which is used by the routing daemons. > IN_EXPERIMENTAL and IN_BADCLASS are the same definition. > > Looking at debian code search IN_EXPERIMENTAL() is still referenced in a > bunch of packages. So I wonder if your alternative to just make > IN_EXPERIMENTAL never match is the right approach.
It looks all or nearly all guarded with ifdefs in some way or other. I don't know what the best approach is but I will do a ports bulk with this removed completely to collect data about how many things fail (I think it will be at the most single-digit numbers, and quite possibly 0).
