On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 09:02:20AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 08:35:44 +0200 > > From: Anton Lindqvist <[email protected]> > > > > Hi, > > Addressing the following nits made it easier for me to grasp the ampintc > > implementation while reading the specification. There's also one missing > > NULL check included. > > > > Too verbose or does anyone else consider this an improvement? > > Your timing is a but unfortunate since I just posted the > suspend/resume diff that will conflict with this. > > Some/all of this may be useful, but not right now :(.
That was actually the thing that reminded me about this diff :) I can wait until things have stabilized and send out a new diff.
