On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 12:09:50AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> i'm hacking on pfsync(4) at the moment, and i wasted way too much time
> wondering how i broke the pfsync ioctls after i didn't the pfsync_status
> output. turns out if you don't have a sync interface set, it skips
> output.
>
> i think it's useful to show that the sync interface is not set, so i
> came up with this.
>
> an unconfigured pfsync interface looks like this with my diff:
>
> pfsync0: flags=0<> mtu 1500
> index 5 priority 0 llprio 3
> pfsync: syncdev none maxupd 128 defer off
> groups: carp pfsync
looks useful to me. I certainly don't object.
OK sashan
