Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <j...@wxcvbn.org> wrote: > Koakuma koac...@protonmail.com wrote: > > 2. I tried a larger set of LLVM patches (D51206, D128263, D130006, > > D132465, D135515, D138532, D138741, D138887, D138922, D139535, and > > D140515) and while it does reduce the kernel binary, it did not > > do it much - the kernel only gets about 10k smaller compared to > > the previous build. > > (that is, still ~77k bigger than the GCC-built binary) > > That's a nice improvement but a lot of patches. patrick@ and I started > working on an update to llvm 15. No timeline yet but maybe some/all of > the changes you mentioned would already be integrated in that update? > (Or conclicting with it...)
Unfortunately, yeah. >From the list, only D51206 and D128263 made it into LLVM 15. The rest is still on LLVM main so those will only hit the release branches starting with LLVM 16 at the earliest, I think?
